Repetitions, abrupt transitions
and paradoxes in Revelation (the Parousia)

4) Christ's Parousia (his future appearance) (14:1-20, 19:11-16)

The greatest paradox in Revelation is three very different references to an anticipated unique event: Christ’s Parousia, i.e. his future ‘coming’ or appearance (14:1-20, 19:11-16).  According to the Gospels, at his trial Jesus said the Son-of-Man will be ‘coming on the clouds of heaven with power and great glory’ (Mt. 24:29-31).[1]  According to Luke, when the resurrected Jesus was outside Jerusalem with his apostles, ‘he (Jesus) was lifted up, and a cloud took him out of their sight. (…) suddenly two men in white robes stood by them (…saying) why do you stand looking up towards heaven? This Jesus, (…) will come in the same way as you saw him go into heaven’ (Acts 1:9-11).  This describes how Christ will return: in a cloud like at the Ascension, perhaps near to Jerusalem.  This will be heralded by a trumpet (Mt. 24:31) and followed by judgement (Mt. 25:31-46, Jn. 5:22-30).


Revelation opens with John’s anticipation of Christ coming in the clouds (1:7) and this image is fulfilled when Christ the slain Lamb appears on Mt Zion (14:1-5; before Babylon falls at 14:8) and he is seen as one-like-a-son-of-man seated on a cloud when the earth is harvested (14:14-20).  The third reference to Christ’s appearance (19:11-16) is as the Rider on a white horse, who has a sharp sword coming out of his mouth (19:15-21).  He is a warrior anticipated as coming ‘like a thief’ (3:3, 16:15).  The warrior with whom John interacts in the vision (from 1:10) also has a sharp (double edged) sword coming out of his mouth (1:16, 2:12-16) and this indicates they are the same person (Christ).[2]  The Rider treads the wine-press full of God’s wrath and he triumphs in the Great Battle (19:11-21), after Babylon falls (at 16:17-21, 18:1-3).  The first image reflects Gospel expectations of the future appearance of Christ and the harvest,[3] and Mt Zion and the warrior/ Rider/ battle/ winepress motif are well established in the Hebrew Bible as eschatological symbols.[4]  From a theological point of view, any of the three choices for the Parousia could be argued because each one represents the different roles of Christ, as saviour, king and judge – so the Parousia will be something like the three parts.


The text and the proposed macrostructure indicates that the Lamb appears on Mt Zion (14:1-5), perhaps during the time of the fifth bowl (time-parallel 8b).  His appearance may trigger the preparations for war at the sixth bowl (time-parallel 9).  However, John is told that Christ will come at an unknown time ‘like a thief! Blessed is the one who stays awake’ (16:15a) so it is entirely possible, in the proposed macrostructure and in reality, that Christ will come at another time during the bowls (see Framework 4A.d).  The Rider appears after Babylon falls and evil forces re-group (at time-parallel 14), ready for the Great Battle (time-parallel 15).  How the appearances of Christ relate to one another is illustrated in the following diagrams (Figures 4 and 5).


[1] See also: Mt. 26:64, Mk. 13:24-27, Mk. 14:62, Lk. 21:25-28, Lk. 22:69. 

[2] The rider of the fourth seal is on a white horse (6:2) but he is not recorded as having a sword coming out of his mouth, so he is not Christ.  He may mimic the Rider, but he brings conquest and this may be an allusion to Roman conquests and the Roman occupation of Judea (see Section 2a).   

[3] Harvest: Mt. 13:36-43, Jn. 4:35-38.  Other references emphasise bringing people into the kingdom: Mt.9:37-38, Mk. 4:26-29, Lk. 10:2.

[4] There are over 100 references to praise or pleas for the salvation of Zion in the Psalms, and prophecies about the Jerusalem’s desolation and future redemption.  Representative of the eschaton, i.e. ‘last days’ or ‘end times’; for example, Is. 63:1-6, Lam.1:15, Joel 3:9-14.

The Lamb appears on Mt Zion and the Rider appears from heaven

When the Rider appears from heaven, ‘he is clothed in a robe dipped in (or sprinkled with) blood’ (19:13).  The robe, not his head or body, is bloodied, so the Rider was not wounded or slain at the crucifixion (so Smalley, 2005; 491; contra Resseguie, 2009: 238, 240).  Several explanations have been put forward as to why there is blood on the Rider’s robe before the winepress/ Great Battle (Osborne, 2002: 682-683).  Osborne discounts the blood as being that of Christ’s enemies (because it is present before the battle) but he also accepts it because of ‘the circularity of the imagery (…) Chronology is ignored for the sake of rhetorical effect.’ (Osborne, 2002: 682; so Paul, 2018: 317).  Smalley considers the blood to be a symbol of the death of God’s enemies (Smalley, 2005; 491) and this study proposes that the blood is a reference to the Rider’s previous battles with his enemies.  Until the Messiah assumes ‘his authority’ (at his crucifixion, resurrection and ascension; 12:10), Michael is the leader of the heavenly army (12:7) but then satan is defeated by the blood of Christ (12:11, 12:17).  Assuming the Warrior/ Rider is the ‘man clothed in linen’ who fights with Prince Michael against the evil princes (Dan. 10:4-11:1), as is most likely, this indicates the Warrior/ Rider transcends time and he fights against evil in the ongoing war which began at Creation (see Section 2).  This suggests Christ the Rider is humanity’s spiritual protector throughout history. 

 

The manner in which the references to the Parousia are reconciled is a defining feature of any commentary.  Ian Paul suggests the different images of Christ in Revelation should be read together because they illustrate ‘a remarkable composite picture of Jesus’ (Paul, 2018: 319-320).  Bauckham suggests the differences between one-like-a-son-of-man on the cloud and the Rider are more than a function of Revelation’s apocalyptic genre,[5] they are ‘deliberately different’ images of Christ, with separate roles; the first receives his universal kingdom (an allusion to Dan. 7:13-14) and the second is divine warrior and judge (Bauckham, 1993b: 294-295).  The figure above illustrates how this study reconciles these two roles of Christ: Christ the Warrior/ Rider is the leader of the heavenly armies on the physical-spiritual earth, who crushes the grapes on the biblical earth (19:15).  Christ on the cloud reflects the Gospels and Dan. 7:13-14, and thus the Parousia (Acts 1:9-11), and is on the biblical earth; the slain Lamb is Christ’s heavenly form (see Section 2).

 

In summary, as well as describing the immediate impact of the shedding of the blood of the Lamb three times, Babylon’s fall four times, and the Parousia three times, there are other unique events which are described more than once in Revelation.  There are two references to the winepress full of God’s wrath (14:19-20, 19:15) and the Second Death (20:13-15, 21:8, but anticipated in 2:11 and 20:6).  There are times when consequences may be separated from their cause(s), for example the abyss opens (9:2) and the abyss beast kills the two witnesses (11:7) but the beast does not rise from the abyss until 13:1.  Scattered concurrent events and possible separations between causes and consequences indicate that the story-line is sometimes non-linear, and the construction of the proposed model is described in Section 5 and illustrated on the Macrostructure Model webpage.

 


[1] See also: Mt. 26:64, Mk. 13:24-27, Mk. 14:62, Lk. 21:25-28, Lk. 22:69. 

[2] The rider of the fourth seal is on a white horse (6:2) but he is not recorded as having a sword coming out of his mouth, so he is not Christ.  He may mimic the Rider, but he brings conquest and this may be an allusion to Roman conquests and the Roman occupation of Judea (see Section 2).    

[3] Harvest: Mt. 13:36-43, Jn. 4:35-38.  Other references emphasise bringing people into the kingdom: Mt.9:37-38, Mk. 4:26-29, Lk. 10:2.

[4] Representative of the eschaton, i.e. ‘last days’ or ‘end times’; for example, Is. 63:1-6, Lam.1:15, Joel 3:9-14.   

[5] Collins suggests the differences between the Rider and the Son-of-Man (historical Jesus) reflect expectations of Christ in the apocalyptic genre (Collins, 2016: 349).  

Page updated 4 November 2024